Eric van Dijk
Professor of Psychology and Social Decision Making
- Name
- Prof.dr. E. van Dijk
- Telephone
- +31 71 527 3709
- dijk@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
- ORCID iD
- 0000-0003-4030-2452
Eric van Dijk graduated in economics and in psychology at Groningen University, and then moved to Leiden to work on his dissertation on social dilemmas. In 1993 he defended his dissertation (cum laude). His research concentrates on the understanding of economic and social decision making. In 2002 he became professor, in 2010 he introduced the Master specialisation Economic and Consumer Psychology at Leiden University, and in 2020 he founded the Knowledge Centre Psychology and Economic Behaviour.
More information about Eric van Dijk
News
-
‘We should have more trust in one another; people are actually very trustworthy’ -
'I don't want that benefit anymore': Why people aren't claiming the financial support they're entitled to -
Dehumanising: how students reject candidate housemates -
The impact of climate change on groups of people -
Leiden University receives gift for research into psychology of economic behaviour
Eric van Dijk graduated in economics and in psychology at Groningen University, and then moved to Leiden to work on his dissertation on social dilemmas. In 1993 he defended his dissertation (cum laude). His research concentrates on the understanding of economic and social decision making. In 2002 he became professor, in 2010 he introduced the Master specialisation Economic and Consumer Psychology at Leiden University, and in 2020 he founded the Knowledge Centre Psychology and Economic Behaviour.
Professor of Psychology and Social Decision Making
- Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen
- Instituut Psychologie
- Soc., Econom. en Organisat Psych.
- Noordewier M.K., Doolaard F.T., Lelieveld G.-J., Dijk E. van, Hilbert L.P., Marr S., Beest I. van, Gallucci M. & Dijk W.W. (2025), A longitudinal study on the association between financial scarcity and feelings of societal exclusion, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 114: 102319.
- Lelieveld G., Noordewier M.K., Doolaard F.T. & Dijk E. van (2024), You are not selected: two field studies on the association between dehumanization and social rejection, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 6: 100182.
- Simonse O., Dijk W. van, Dillen L.F. van & Dijk E. van (2024), Economic predictors of the subjective experience of financial stress, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 42: 100933.
- Simonse O., Dillen L.F. van, Dijk W. van & Dijk E. van (2024), Waarom laten mensen toeslagen liggen? , Gerōn: Tijdschrift over ouder worden & samenleving 31(1): .
- Ye Z., Lelieveld G. & Dijk E. van (2024), Evaluating negotiators who deceptively communicate anger or happiness: on the importance of morality, sociability, and competence, Journal of Business Ethics : .
- Vogelaar R., Dijk E. van & Dijk W.W. van (2024), The appraisal patterns and response types of enthusiasm: a comparison with joy and hope, Cognition and Emotion : 1-19.
- Christmann T., Goslinga S., Dijk E. van & Dijk W.W. van (2024), De invloed van onzekerheid over de controlekans op belastingcompliance: een experimentele studie in opdracht van de Belastingdienst. Leiden: KCPEG. Leiden: KCPEG.
- Meral E.O., Ren D., Osch Y. van, Dijk E. van & Beest I. van (2023), Do targets of ostracism truthfully communicate their emotional reactions to sources?, Acta Psychologica 237: 103956.
- Simonse O., Knoef M.G., Dillen L.F. van, Dijk W. van & Dijk E. van (2023), Psychological barriers to take-up of healthcare and child support benefits in the Netherlands, Journal of European Social Policy 33(3): 353-372.
- Kwaadsteniet E.W. de, Gross J. & Dijk E. van (2023), A “More-is-Better” heuristic in anticommons dilemmas: psychological insights from a new anticommons bargaining game, Journal of Economic Psychology 98: 102653.
- Ye Z., Lelieveld G-J., Noordewier M.K. & Dijk E. van (2023), So you want me to believe you’re happy or angry? : How negotiators perceive and respond to emotion deception, Group Decision and Negotiation 32: 1469-1496.
- Dijk E. van, Zeelenberg M., Bruine de Bruin W. & Rooij R.J.B. de (2023), What comes to mind when considering looking into and/or adjusting one’s pension: an empirical study among UK and US residents. Netspar Design Papers no. 231. Tilburg: Netspar.
- Dare S.E., Dijk W.W. van, Dijk E. van Dillen L.F. van, Gallucci M & Simonse O. (2023), How executive functioning and financial self-efficacy predict subjective financial well-being via positive financial behaviors, Journal of Family and Economic Issues 44(2): 232-248.
- Simonse O., Vanderveen G., Dillen L.F. van, Dijk W.W. van & Dijk E. van (2023), Social security or insecurity? The experience of welfare participation by financially vulnerable households in the Netherlands, Social Policy and Administration 57(3): 255-271.
- Meral E.O., Vranjes I., Osch Y. van, Ren D., Dijk E. van & Beest I. van (2023), Intensity, intent, and ambiguity: appraisals of workplace ostracism and coping responses, Aggressive Behavior 49(2): 127-140.
- Molenmaker W.E., Gross J., Kwaadsteniet E.W. de, Dijk E. van & Dreu C.K.W. de (2023), Discriminatory punishment undermines the enforcement of group cooperation, Scientific Reports 13: 6061.
- Doesum N.J. van, Lange P. A.M. van, Tybur J.M., Leal A. & Dijk E. van (2022), People from lower social classes elicit greater prosociality: compassion and deservingness matter, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 25(4): 1064-1083.
- Molenmaker W.E., Lelieveld G., Kwaadsteniet E.W. de & Dijk E. van (2022), Applying a logic of appropriateness to understand behavioral differences between common resource dilemmas and public good dilemmas, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 35(1): e2243.
- Gummerum M., López-Pérez B., Dijk E. van & Dillen L.F. van (2022), Ire and punishment: incidental anger and costly punishment in children, adolescents, and adults, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 218: 105376.
- Lelieveld G. & Dijk E. van (2022), Emotions in bargaining. In: Karagözoğlu E. & Hyndman K.B. (Eds.), Bargaining: current research and future directions: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. 433-454.
- Doolaard F.T., Lelieveld G.J., Noordewier M.K., Beest I. van & Dijk E. van (2022), How information on sexism may increase women's perceptions of being excluded, threaten fundamental needs, and lower career motivation, European Journal of Social Psychology 52(3): 405-419.
- Simonse O., Dijk W. van, Dillen L.F. van & Dijk E. van (2022), The role of financial stress in mental health changes during COVID-19, Mental Health Research 1: 15.
- Dijk E. van, Knippenberg D. van., Camps J. & Stouten J. (2022), Groepsgedrag. In: Vonk R. (Ed.), Sociale psychologie: Boom uitgevers. 431-481.
- Simonse O., Vanderveen G., Dillen L.F. van, Dijk W. van & Dijk E. van (2022), Waarom mensen geen gebruik maken van sociale voorzieningen, Sociaal Bestek 84(6).
- Sun Q., Molenmaker W.E., Zhang Y., Liu Y. & Dijk E. van (2022), Procedural fairness facilitates cooperative behavior by enhancing cooperative expectations, Social and Personality Psychology Compass 16(12): e12711.
- Dijk E. van & Dreu C.K.W. de (2021), Experimental games and social decision making, Annual Review of Psychology 72: 415-438.
- Doolaard F.T., Noordewier M.K., Lelieveld G.J., Beest I. van & Dijk E. van (2021), Go on without me: when underperforming group members prefer to leave their group, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 95: e104158.
- Cramwinckel F.M., Bos K. van den & Dijk E. van (2021), Evaluating others if they stand up for their moral convictions, and evaluating ourselves if we don't stand up, Social Justice Research 34(2): 173-195.
- Wu Y., Dijk E. van & Li H. (2021), Acute stress amplifies experienced and anticipated regret in counterfactual decision-making, Stress 24(4): 359-369.
- Schutter M., Dijk E. van, Kwaadsteniet E. W. de & Dijk W. W. van (2021), The detrimental effects of no trust: active decisions of no trust cause stronger affective and behavioral reactions than inactive decisions, Frontiers in Psychology 12: e643174.
- Stel M. & Dijk E. van (2021), Response: commentary: distrust, false cues, and below-chance deception detection accuracy: commentary on Stel et al. (2020) and further reflections on (un)conscious lie detection from the perspective of truth-default theory, Frontiers in Psychology 12: 763218.
- Meral E.O., Osch Y. van, Ren D., Dijk E. van & Beest I. van (2021), The anticipated social cost of disclosing a rejection experience, European Journal of Social Psychology 51(7): 1181-1197.
- Gummerum M., López-Pérez B., Dijk E. van & Dillen L.F. van (2020), When punishment is emotion‐driven: children's, adolescents’, and adults’ costly punishment of unfair allocations, Social Development 29(1): 126-142.
- Mulder L.B. & Dijk E. van (2020), Moral rationalization contributes more strongly to escalation of unethical behavior among low moral identifiers than among high moral identifiers, Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2912.
- Doolaard F.T., Lelieveld G.J., Noordewier M.K., Van Beest I. & Van Dijk E. (2020), Get out or stay out: how the social exclusion process affects actors, but not targets, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 88: e103946.
- Van Dijk E., De Dreu C.K.W. & Gross J. (2020), Power in economic games, Current Opinion in Psychology 33: 100-104.
- Dare S.E., Dijk W.W. van, Dijk E. van, Dillen L.F. van, Gallucci M. & Simonse O. (2020), The effect of financial education on pupil's financial knowlegde and skills: evidence from a Solomon four-group design, The Journal of Educational Research 113(2): 93-107.
- Stel M., Schwarz A., Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg A. (2020), The limits of conscious deception detection: when reliance on false deception cues contributes to inaccurate judgments, Frontiers in Psychology 11: .
- Dijk W.W. van, Goslinga S., Terwel B.W. & Dijk E. van (2020), How choice architecture can promote and undermine tax compliance: testing the effects of prepopulated tax returns and accuracy confirmation, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 87: 101574.
- Noordewier M.K. & Dijk E. van (2020), Deprivation and discovery motives determine how it feels to be curious, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 35: 71-76.
- Gangl K. Dijk W.W. van Dijk E. van Hofmann E. (2020), Building versus maintaining a perceived confidence-based tax climate: experimental evidence, Journal of Economic Psychology 81: 102310.
- Gross J.A.J., Veistola S., Dreu C.K.W. de & Dijk E. van (2020), Self-reliance crowds out group cooperation and increases wealth inequality, Nature Communications 11: 5161.
- Dare S.E., Dijk W.W. van, Dijk E. van, Dillen L.F. van, Gallucci M. & Simonse O. (2020), The road to financial satisfaction: testing the paths of knowledge, attitudes, sense of control and positive financial behaviors, Journal of Financial Therapy 11(2): e2.
- Mooijman M., Van Dijk W.W., Dijk E. & Ellemers N. (2019), Leader power, power stability, and interpersonal trust, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 152: 1-10.
- Castiglioni C., Lozza E., Van Dijk E. & Van Dijk W.W. (2019), Two sides of the same coin? An investigation on the effects of frames on tax compliance and charitable giving, Palgrave Communications 5: e39.
- Warreman E.B., Lambregts M.M.C., Wouters R.H.P., Visser L.G., Staats H., Van Dijk E. & De Boer M.G.J. (2019), Determinants of in-hospital antibiotic prescription behaviour: a systematic review and formation of a comprehensive framework. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Clinical Microbiology and Infection 25(5): 538-545.
- Lambregts M.M.C., Visser L.G., De Boer M.G.J., Staats H. & Van Dijk E. (2019), Determinants of in-hospital antibiotic prescription behaviour - Author's reply, Clinical Microbiology and Infection 25(5): 638-639.
- Noordewier M.K. & Van Dijk E. (2019), Surprise: Unfolding of facial expressions, Cognition and Emotion 33(5): 915-930.
- Molenmaker W.E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Van Dijk E. (2019), The effect of decision timing on the willingness to costly reward cooperation and punish noncooperation: sanctioning the past, the present, or the future, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 32(3): 241-254.
- De Kwaadsteniet E.W., Kiyonari T., Molenmaker W.E. & Van Dijk E. (2019), Do people prefer leaders who enforce norms? Reputational effects of reward and punishment decisions in noisy social dilemmas, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 84: e103800.
- Wu Y., Lu J., Dijk E. van, Li H. & Schnall S. (2018), The color red is implicitly associated with social status in the United Kingdom and China, Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1902.
- Stel M. & Dijk E. van (2018), When do we see that others misrepresent how they feel? Detecting deception from emotional faces with direct and indirect measures, Social Influence 13(3): 137-149.
- Van Dijk E., Van Beest I., Van Kleef G.A. & Lelieveld G.J. (2018), Communication of anger versus disappointment in bargaining and the moderating role of power, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 31: 632-643.
- Lelieveld G.J., Inbar Y. & Dijk E. van (2018), Explaining reluctance to benefit from others' misfortune, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 31(5): 662-672.
- Van Putten M., Potter Van Loon R., Turlings M. & Van Dijk E. (2018), Framing in pensioenkeuzes. Het effect van framing in de keuze voor beleggingsprofiel in DC-plannen naar aanleiding van de Wet verbeterde premieregeling no. 112. Tilburg: Netspar.
- Noordewier M.K. & Van Dijk E. (2017), Curiosity and time: From not knowing to almost knowing, Cognition and Emotion 31(3): 411-421.
- Dijk E. van, Makagonova V., Kwaadsteniet E.W. de & Schutter M. (2017), Deterrence-based trust in bargaining: Introducing a new experimental paradigm, Journal of Trust Research 7(1): 71-89.
- Mooijman M., Van Dijk W.W., Van Dijk E. & Ellemers N. (2017), On sanction-goal justifications: how and why deterrence justifications undermine rule compliance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112(4): 577-588.
- Hoorn J. van, Dijk E. van, Crone E.A., Stockmann L. & Rieffe C. (2017), Peers influence prosocial behaviour in adolescent males with autism spectrum disorders, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47(7): 2225-2237.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg D. (2017), Groepsgedrag. In: Vonk R. (Ed.), Sociale Psychologie, 4e herziene druk. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom. 461-518.
- Wu Y., Van Dijk E., Li H., Aitken M. & Clark L. (2017), On the counterfactual nature of gambling near-misses: an experimental study, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 30: 855-868.
- Noordewier M.K., Topolinski S. & Dijk E. van (2016), The temporal dynamics of surprise, Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10(3): 136-149.
- Stel M., Van Dijk E. & Baaren R.B. (2016), When and why mimicry is facilitated and attenuated, Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10(10): 561-574.
- Putten M. van, Van der Schors A., Dijk E. van & Dijk W. van (2016), Consumenteninertie in de keuze van contracten van dienstenmarkten. Onderzoek in opdracht van het Behavioural Insights Team van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken.
- Van Hoorn J., Van Dijk E., Meuwese R., Rieffe C. & Crone E.A. (2016), Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence, Journal of Research on Adolescence 26(1): 90-100.
- Van Putten M., Van Dijk W.W. & Van Dijk E. (2016), Beleid voor de irrationele mens: Hoe gedragswetenschap de bestuurskunde zou kunnen versterken, Bestuurskunde 25: 17-23.
- Steinel W., Koning L., Van Dijk E. & Beest I. (2016), Deception as a means to an end: An instrumental approach. In: Prooijen J.W. van & Lange P.A.M. van (Eds.), Cheating, corruption, and dishonesty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 55-72.
- Wu Y., Van Dijk E., Aitken M. & Clark L. (2016), Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 16(2): 353-361.
- Noordewier M.K. & Dijk E. van (2016), Interest in complex novelty, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 38(2): 98-110.
- Van Hoorn J., Van Dijk E., Güroglu B. & Crone E.A.M. (2016), Neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on public goods game donations during adolescence, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11(6): 923-933.
- Cramwinckel F.M., Bos K. van den, Dijk E. van & Schut M. (2016), Derogating benevolent behaviour of deviant in-group members: group processes within a real-life sample of heterosexual Christians, Social Influence 11(1): 75-86.
- Gummerum M., Van Dillen L.F., Van Dijk E. & López-Pérez B. (2016), Costly third-party interventions: The role of incidental anger and attention focus in punishment of the perpetrator and compensation of the victim, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 65: 94-104.
- Blue P.R., Hu J., Wang X., Van Dijk E. & Zhou X. (2016), When do low status individuals accept less? The interaction between self- and other-status during resource distribution, Frontiers in Psychology 7: e1667.
- Molenmaker Welmer E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Van Dijk E. (2016), The impact of personal responsibility on the (un)willingness to punish non-cooperation and rewards cooperation, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 134: 1-15.
- Van Putten M., Van der Schors A., Van Dijk E. & Van Dijk W. (2016), Consumenteninertie in de keuze van contracten van dienstenmarkten. Onderzoek in opdracht van het Behavioural Insights Team van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken. Amsterdam - Leiden, The Netherlands: Nibud and Leiden University.
- Cramwinckel F.M., Van den Bos K. & Van Dijk E. (2015), Reactions to morally motivated deviance, Current Opinion in Psychology 6: 150-156.
- Van Dijk E., Molenmaker W.E. & De Kwaadsteniet E.W. (2015), Promoting cooperation in social dilemmas: The use of sanctions, Current Opinion in Psychology 6: 118-122.
- Van Dijk E. (2015), Social Dilemmas, Psychology of. In: Wright J.D. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences no. 22. Oxford United Kingdom: Elsevier. 245-249.
- Van Dijk E. (2015), The economics of prosocial behavior. In: Schroeder D.A. & Graziano W. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 86-99.
- Wu Y., Van Dijk E. & Clark L. (2015), Near-wins and near-losses in gambling: A behavioral and facial EMG study, Psychophysiology 52(3): 359-366.
- Mooijman M., Van Dijk W.W., Ellemers N. & Van Dijk E. (2015), Why leaders punish: A power perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 109(1): 75-89.
- Molenmaker Welmer E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Van Dijk E. (2014), On the willingness to costly reward cooperation and punish non-cooperation: The moderating role of type of social dilemma, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 125(2): 175-183.
- Van Prooijen J.-W. & Van Dijk E. (2014), When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55: 63-73.
- Van Dijk E., Mulder L.B. & Kwaadsteniet E.W. (2014), For the common good? The use of sanctions in social dilemmas. In: Lange P.A.M. van, Rockenbach B. & Yamagishi T. (Eds.), Reward and punishment in social dilemmas. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 70-84.
- Putten M. van, Zeelenberg M., Dijk E. van & Tykocinski O.E. (2014), Inaction inertia, European Review of Social Psychology 24(1): 123-159.
- Steinel W., Van Beest I. & Van Dijk E. (2014), Too good to be true: Suspicion-based rejections of high offers, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 17(5): 682-698.
- Daamen D.D.L., Gerritsen M., Van Dijk E. & Terwel B.W. (2014), Splitting or merging information affects evaluations in an Information-Choice Questionnaire, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(1): 66-85.
- Lelieveld G.-J., Van Dijk E., Güroğlu B., Van Beest I., Van Kleef G.A., Rombouts S.A.R.B. & Crone E.A. (2013), Behavioral and neural reactions to emotions of others in the distribution of resources, Social Neuroscience 8(1): 52-62.
- Van Dijk E. (2013), The economics of prosocial behaviour. In: Schroeder D.A. & Graziano W. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg D. (2013), Groepsgedrag. In: Vonk R. (Ed.), Sociale Psychologie no. 2013. Groningen: Noordhoff. 483-533.
- Koning L.F. & Van Dijk E. (2013), Motivated cognition on negotiation. In: Olekalns M. & Adair W.L. (Eds.), Handbook of research on negotiation: Edward Elgar Publishing. 46-74.
- Cramwinckel F.M., Van den Bos K., Van Dijk E., Bruin A., Van Oudvorst S. & Van Sprakelaar M. (2013), Gedeelde waarden in confrontaties met morele weigeraars: Tegenovergestelde effecten op zelf- en weigeraar beoordelingen. In: Dotsch R., Papies E.K., Pronk T.M., Rutjens B.T., Toorn J. van der & Ufkes E.G. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2013. Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie. Groningen Nederland: ASPO pers. 57-60.
- Molenmaker Welmer E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Van Dijk E. (2013), Kostbaar straffen en belonen in 'warme' versus 'koude' sociale dilemma's. In: Dotsch R., Papies E.K., Pronk T.M., Rutjens B.T., Toorn J. van der & Ufkes E.G. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2013. Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie. Groningen Nederland: ASPO pers. 141-144.
- Cramwinckel F.M., Van Dijk E., Scheepers D.T. & Van den Bos K. (2013), The threat of moral refusers for one's self-concept and the protective function of physical cleansing, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6): 1049-1058.
- Dijk E. van, Parks C.D. & Lange P.A.M. van (2013), Social dilemmas: The challenge of human cooperation, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 120: 123-124.
- De Kwaadsteniet E.W., Rijkhoff S.A.M. & Van Dijk E. (2013), Equality as a benchmark for third-party punishment and reward: The moderating role of uncertainty in social dilemmas, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 120: 251-259.
- Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2013), How consumers deal with missed discounts: Transaction decoupling, action orientation and inaction inertia, Journal of Economic Psychology 38: 104-110.
- Lokhorst A.M., Werner C., Staats H., Van Dijk E. & Gale J.L. (2013), Commitment and behavior change: A meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research, Environment and Behavior 45(1): 3-34.
- Wu Y., Dijk E. van & Zhou X. (2013), Evaluating self - vs. other-owned objects: The modulatory role of oxytocin, Biological Psychology 92: 179-184.
- Van Lange P.A.M., Joireman J.A., Parks C.D. & Van Dijk E. (2013), The psychology of social dilemmas: A review, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 120(2): 125-141.
- Lelieveld G.-J., Van Dijk E., Van Beest I. & Van Kleef G.A. (2013), Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(4): 605-620.
- Wu Y., Hu J., Dijk E. van, Leliveld M.C. & Zhou X. (2012), Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: Does the initial ownership play a role?, PLoS ONE 7(6): e39627.
- De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Van Dijk E. (2012), A social-psychological perspective on tacit coordination: How it works, when it works (and when it does not), European Review of Social Psychology 23: 187-223.
- De Kwaadsteniet E.W., Homan A.C., Van Dijk E. & Van Beest I. (2012), Social information as a cue to tacit coordination, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15(2): 257-271.
- Mooijman M., Van Dijk W.W. & Van Dijk E. (2012), De morele voordelen van straffen: Altruistisch straffen als morele compensatie. In: Strick M., Baas M., Dillen L. van, Dotsch R., Lakens D. & Vries M. de (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2012. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 157-161.
- Lelieveld G.-J., Van Dillen L.F., Van Dijk W.W. & Van Dijk E. (2012), Iedereen aan de bal: De geneigdheid om uitsluiting van anderen te voorkomen. In: Ven N. van, Baas M., Dillen L. van, Lakens D., Lokhorst A.M. & Strick M. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2011. Groningen: ASPO Pers.
- Lelieveld G.-J., Van Dijk E., Van Beest I. & Van Kleef G.A. (2012), De communicatie van teleurstelling in onderhandelingen. Wanneer gecommuniceerde zwakte loont en averechts werkt. In: Strick M., Baas M., Dillen L. van, Dotsch R., Lakens D. & Vries M. de (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2012. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 121-130.
- Mooijman M., Van Dijk W.W. & Van Dijk E. (2012), Het morele zelfbeeld en strafgedrag: Hoe morele identiteitsbedreiging tot meer altruïstisch staffen leidt. In: Ven N. van, Baas M., Dillen L. van, Lakens D., Lokhorst A. & Strick M. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2011. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 145-148.
- Molenmaker Welmer E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Van Dijk E. (2012), Ik beloon je met meer dan alleen mijn trots: Altruïstisch belonen en de rol van trots in twee types sociale dilemma's. In: Strick M., Baas M., Dillen L. van, Dotsch R., Lakens D. & Vries M. de (Eds.), Jaarboek Socale Psychologie 2012. Groningen: ASPO pers. 147-150.
- Stel M., Van Dijk E., Smith P.K., Van Dijk W.W. & Djalal F.M. (2012), Lowering the pith of your voice makes you feel more powerful and think more abstractly, Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(4): 497-502.
- Harinck S., Van Beest I., Dijk E. & Van Zeeland M. (2012), Measurement-induced focusing and the magnitude of loss aversion: The difference between comparing gains to losses and losses to gains, Judgment and Decision Making 7(4): 462-471.
- Lelieveld G.-J., Van Dijk E., Van Beest I. & Van Kleef G.A. (2012), Why anger and disappointment affect other's bargaining behavior differently: The moderating role of reciprocal and complementary emotions, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(9): 1209-1221.
- Van den Bos W., Van Dijk E. & Crone E.A. (2012), Learning whom to trust in repeated social interactions: A developmental perspective, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15(2): 243-256.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2012), Is pride a prosocial emotion? Interpersonal effects of authentic and hubristic pride, Cognition and Emotion 26(6): 1084-1097.
- Leliveld M.C., Van Dijk E. & Van Beest I. (2012), Punishing and compensating others at your own expense: The role of empathic concern on reactions to distributive injustice, En Letra 42(2): 135-140.
- Van Beest I., Carter-Sowell A.R., Williams K.D. & Van Dijk E. (2012), Groups being ostracized by groups: Is the pain shared, is recovery quicker, and are groups more likely to be aggressive?, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 16: 241-254.
- Lokhorst A.M., Staats H., Dijk J. van, Dijk E. van & Snoo G.R. de (2011), What's in it for me? Movational differences between farmers' voluntary and subsidized nature conservation practices, Applied Psychology 60(3): 337-353.
- Crone E.A. & Van Dijk E. (2011), Waarom gedragen we ons sociaal?. In: Schnabel P., Abma R., Klandermans B., Meyer B., Teulings C., Thomassen J., Roes T., Giesen P. & Calmthout M. (Eds.), Wat iedereen moet weten van de menswetenschappen: De Gammacanon. Amsterdam: J.M. Meulenhoff. 175-177.
- Van Dijk E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W. & Koning L.F. (2011), About behaving (un)ethically: Self-interest, deception and fairness. In: De Cremer D. & Tenbrunsel A.E. (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: shaping an emerging field. New York: Psychology Press. 105-121.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2011), On the near miss in public good dilemmas: How upward counterfactuals influence group stability when the group fails, Estética 47(1): 139-146.
- Lelieveld G.-J., Van Dijk E., Van Beest I., Steinel W. & Van Kleef G.A. (2011), Disappointed in you, angry about your offer: Distinct negative emotions induce concessions via different mechanisms, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(3): 635-641.
- Wu Y., Zhou Y., Van Dijk E., Leliveld M.C. & Zhou X. (2011), Social comparison affects brain responses to fairness in asset division: an ERP study with the ultimatum game, Frontiers in Neuroscience 5: .
- Güroğlu B., Van den Bos W., Van Dijk E., Rombouts S.A.R.B. & Crone E.A. (2011), Dissociable brain networks involved indevelopment of fairness considerations: Understanding intentionality behind unfairness, NeuroImage 57(2): 634-641.
- Raeva D., Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2011), How comparing decision outcomes affects subsequent decisions: The carry-over of a comparative mind-set, Judgment and Decision Making 6(4): 343-350.
- Desmet T.M., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2011), In money we trust? The use of final compensation to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 114(2): 75-86.
- Van Beest I., Williams K.D. & Van Dijk E. (2011), Cyberbomb: Effects of being ostracized from a death game, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 14(4): 581-596.
- Van den Bos W., Van Dijk E., Westenberg P.M., Rombouts S.A.R.B. & Crone E.A. (2011), Changing brains, changing perspectives: The neurocognitive development of reciprocity, Psychological Science 22(1): 60-70.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2011), The communication of anger and disappointment helps to establish cooperation through indirect reciprocity, Journal of Economic Psychology 32: 489-501.
- Koning L.F., Steinel W., Van Beest I. & Van Dijk E. (2011), Power and deception in ultimatum bargaining, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115(1): 35-42.
- Nelissen R.M.A., Leliveld M.C., Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2011), Fear and guilt in proposers: Using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining, En Letra 41: 78-85.
- Desmet P.T.M., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2011), Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness, Personality and Individual Differences 51(3): 267-273.
- Mastop J., Stel M. & Van Dijk E. (2010), Imiteren of complementeren? Het effect van rechtvaardigheid en status op imiteren of complementeren van non-verbaal gedrag. In: Prooijen J.W. van, Renes R.J., Derks B., Stel M. & Vliek M. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2009. Groningen: Aspo Pers. 261-268.
- De Dreu C.K.W., Greer L.L., Handgraaf M.J.J., Shalvi S., Van Kleef G.A., Baas M., Ten Velden F.S., Van Dijk E. & Feith S.W.W. (2010), The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans, Science 328(5984): 1408-1411.
- Cramwinckel F.M., Van Dijk E. & Scheepers D.T. (2010), Was je handen in onschuld: Hoe lichamelijke reiniging morele identiteits-bedreiging vermindert. In: Renes R.J., Ruijs K., Ven N. van de, Vliek M. & Derks B. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2010. Groningen: ASPO Pers.
- De Cremer D., Van Dijk E. & Pillutla M.M. (2010), Explaining unfair offers in ultimatum games and their effects on trust: An experimental approach, Business Ethics Quarterly 20(1): 107-126.
- Stel M., Van Baaren R.B., Blascovich J., Van Dijk E., McCall C., Pollman M.H., Van Leeuwen M.L., Mastop J. & Vonk R. (2010), Effects of a priori liking on the elicitation of mimicry, Estética 57(6): 412-418.
- De Heus P., Hoogervorst N. & Van Dijk E. (2010), Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner's dilemma and the chicken game, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 736-742.
- Desmet T.M., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2010), On the psychology of financial compensations to restore fairness transgressions: When intentions determine value, Journal of Business Ethics 95: 105-115.
- Mulder L.B., Van Dijk E. & De Cremer D. (2009), When sanctions that can be evaded still work: The role of trust in leaders, Social Influence 4(2): 122-137.
- Stel M., Van Dijk E. & Olivier E.A. (2009), You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic!, Psychological Science 20(6): 693-699.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2009), How emotion communication guides reciprocity: Establishing cooperation through disappointment and anger, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(4): 987-990.
- Van Dijk E., Leliveld M.C. & Van Beest I. (2009), If it walks like fairness, and quacks like fairness, it sometimes is fairness: Instrumental and true fairness in bargaining, Netherlands Journal of Psychology 65(4): 155-162.
- Stel M., Van Dijk E. & Olivier E. (2009), Wil je de waarheid weten? Imiteer dan niet!. Custers R., Beersma B., Berg H. van den, Harinck F. & Zomeren M. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2008. ASPO 2008. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 403-411.
- Leliveld M.C., Van Beest I., Van Dijk E. & Tenbrunsel A.E. (2009), Understanding the influence of outcome valence in bargaining: A study on fairness accessibility, norms, and behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3): 505-514.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2009), Behavioral (In)tolerance of equality violation in social dilemmas: When trust affects contribution decisions after violations of equality, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 12(4): 517-531.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2009), When and how communicated guilt affects contributions in public good dilemmas, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(1): 15-23.
- De Cremer D., Van Dijk E. & Reinders Folmer C.P. (2009), Why leaders feel more entitled to take more: Feelings of entitlement as a moral rationalization strategy. In: De Cremer D. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making 107-119.
- Leliveld M.C., Van Dijk E. & Van Beest I. (2009), Altruïstisch straffen vs. altruïstisch compenseren: Hoe mensen reageren op onrechtvaardigheid. Custers R., Beersma B., Berg H. van den, Harinck F. & Zomeren M. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2008. ASPO 2008. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 253-262.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2009), When being disadvantaged grows into vengeance: The effects of asymmetry of interest and social rejection in social dilemmas, En Letra 39: 526-539.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2009), Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymetry and accountability, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109: 45-55.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Beest I. (2009), Coalitions. In: , Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 91-93.
- Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2009), De (ir)rationaliteit van de beslisser. In: Tiemeijer W.L., Thomast C.A. & Prast H.M. (Eds.), De menselijke beslisser: Over de psychologie van keuze en gedrag.. Den Haag/Amsterdam: WRR/Amsterdam University Press. 25-46.
- Mastop J., Stel M. & Van Dijk E. (2009), Imiteren of complementeren van nonverbaal gedrag: Het belang van status. Custers R., Beersma B., Berg H. van den, Harinck F. & Zomeren M. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2008. . Groningen: ASPO Pers. 271-278.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2009), Hoe gecommuniceerde emoties wederkerigheid sturen: Het bewerkstelligen van coöperatie door boosheid en teleurstelling. Custers R., Beersma B., Berg H. van den, Harinck F. & Zomeren M. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2008. ASPO 2008. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 523-531.
- Leliveld M.C., Van Dijk E. & Van Beest I. (2008), Initial ownership in bargaining: Introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(9): 1214-1225.
- Van Dijk E., De Cremer D., Mulder L.B. & Stouten J. (2008), How do we react to feedback in social dilemmas?. In: Biel A., Eek D., Gaerling T. & Gustafsson M. (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas.. New York: Springer. 43-57.
- Handgraaf M.J.J., Van Dijk E., Vermunt G.C.M., Wilke H.A.M. & De Dreu C.K.W. (2008), Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(5): 1136-1149.
- Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2008), Multiple options in the past and the present: The impact on inaction inertia, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21: 519-531.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2008), When emotions of others affect decisions in public good dilemmas: An instrumental view, En Letra 38: 823-835.
- Wubben M.J.J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2008), Wanneer en hoe gecommuniceerde schuld bijdragen beinvloedt in publiek goed dilemma' s. In: Karremans J., Beersma B., Custers R., Harreveld F. van & Rijswijk W. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2007. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 415-423.
- Van Beest I., Van Kleef G.A. & Van Dijk E. (2008), Get angry, get out: The interpersonal effects of anger communication in multiparty negotiation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44: 993-1002.
- Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2008), Het unieke effect van gemengde gevoelens. In: Karremans J., Beersma B., Custers R., Harreveld F. van & Rijswijk W. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2007.. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 281-289.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2008), Leader-follower effects in resource dilemmas: The roles of leadership selection and social responsibility, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 11(3): 355-369.
- De Cremer D., Van Knippenberg D.L., Van Dijk E. & Van Leeuwen E.A.C. (2008), Cooperating if one's goals are collective-based: Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(6): 1562-1579.
- Van Beest I. & Van Dijk E. (2007), Self-interest and fairness in coalition formation: A social utility approach to understanding partner selection and payoff allocations in groups. In: Stroebe W. & Hewstone M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 18). European Review of Social Psychology. Hove/New York: Psychology Press. 132-174.
- Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2007), De invloed van alternatieve keuzemogelijkheden op het inactie inertie effect. In: Laar C. van, Ruiter R., Karremans J., Rijswijk W. van & Harreveld F. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2006. Groningen: Aspo Pers. 403-410.
- Leliveld M.C., Van Beest I. & Van Dijk E. (2007), Eigenbelang en eerlijkheid bij ultimatum onderhandelen over positieve en negatieve opbrengsten. In: Laar C. van, Ruiter R., Karremans J., Rijswijk W. van & Harreveld F. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2006. Groningenn: Aspo Pers. 273-280.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2007), Managing equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive implications, Social Justice Research 20(1): 53-67.
- Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2007), When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision-making under uncertainty., Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 656-662.
- Van Lange P.A.M., De Cremer D., Van Dijk E. & Van Vugt M. (2007), Self-interest and beyond; Basic principles of social interaction. In: Kruglanski A.W. & Higgins E.T. (Eds.), Social psychology; Handbook of basic principles.. New York/London: The Guilford Press. 540-561.
- Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2007), Decoupling the past from the present attenuates inaction inertia, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20: 65-79.
- Mulder L.B., Van Dijk E. & De Cremer D. (2006), Fighting noncooperative behavior in organizations: The dark side of sanctions. In: Mannix E.A., Neale M.A. & Tenbrunsel A.E. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams Volume 8: Ethics in groups.. San Diego, CA: JAI Press. 59-81.
- Mulder L.B., Van Dijk E., De Cremer D. & Wilke H.A.M. (2006), When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: Considering the presence of an alternative option to defect, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(10): 1312-1324.
- Van Dijk E. & De Cremer D. (2006), Tacit coordination and social dilemmas: On the importance of self-interest and fairness. In: De Cremer D., Zeelenberg M. & Murnighan J.K. (Eds.), Social psychology and economics.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 141-154.
- Van Dijk E. (2006), From social psychology to economics and back again: The benefits of a two-way street. In: Lange P.A.M. van (Ed.), Bridging Social Psychology. Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 409-413.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2006), Violating equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive reactions as a function of trust, attribution, and honesty, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(7): 894-906.
- Mulder L.B., Van Dijk E., De Cremer D. & Wilke H.A.M. (2006), Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 147-162.
- Zeelenberg M., Nijstad B.A., Van Putten M. & Van Dijk E. (2006), Inaction inertia, regret, and valuation: A closer look, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 101(1): 89-104.
- Leliveld M.C., Van Dijk E. & Van Beest I. (2006), De rol van aanvankelijk bezit in ultimatum onderhandelen. In: Holland R.W., Ouwerkerk J., Laar C. van, Ruiter R. & Ham J. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2005. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 301-311.
- Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2006), Ontkoppeling van heden en verleden: Voorwaarden voor het inactie inertie effect. In: Holland R.W., Ouwerkerk J., Laar C. van, Ruiter R. & Ham J. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2005. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 389-401.
- Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2006), The dampening effect of uncertainty on positive and negative emotions, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19: 171-176.
- Van Dijk E. & De Cremer D. (2006), Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(10): 1352-1361.
- Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2005), On the psychology of 'if only': Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomes,, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97(2): 152-160.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2005), I'm doing the best I can (for myself): Leadership and variance of harvesting in resource dilemma's, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 9(3): 205-211.
- Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2005), On the comparative nature of regret. In: Mandel D.R., Hilton D.J. & Catellani P. (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking.. London/New York: Routledge. 147-160.
- Van Beest I., Van Dijk E., De Dreu C.K.W. & Wilke H.A.M. (2005), Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41: 609-617.
- Van Dijk E. & Tenbrunsel A.E. (2005), The battle between self-interest and fairness. In: Gilliland S.W., Steiner D.D., Skarlicki D.P. & Bos K. van den (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations?. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. 31-48.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2005), All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation, En Letra 35(6): 767-783.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2005), When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled, En Letra 35: 553-563.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg D.L. (2005), Wanna trade? Product knowledge and the perceived differences between the gains and losses of trade, En Letra 35: 23-34.
- Van de Ven N., Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (2005), Buying and selling exchange goods: Outcome information, curiosity and the endowment effect, Journal of Economic Psychology 26: 459-468.
- Mulder L.B., Van Dijk E., Wilke H.A.M. & De Cremer D. (2005), The effect of feedback on support for a sanctioning system in a social dilemma: The difference between installing and maintaining the sanction, Journal of Economic Psychology 26: 443-458.
- Zeelenberg M., Pieters R. & Van Dijk E. (2005), Spijt als haren op mijn hoofd. Het vermijden van spijt bij het nemen van beslissingen. In: Doosje B. & Fischer A.H. (Eds.), Ik ben niet boos, maar teleurgesteld ... Emoties in het dagelijks leven.. Amsterdam: Scriptum Psychologie. 77-85.
- Tromp R., Van Dijk E. & Vonk R. (2005), Het doneren van geld aan anderen: Hoe meer gegadigden, hoe minder we geven?. In: Gordijn E.H., Holland R., Meijnders A. & Ouwerkerk J. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2004.. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 421-429.
- Van Beest I., Van de Velde N. & Van Dijk E. (2004), Is iemand negeren vermoeiend of eigenlijk met name vervelend?. In: Wigboldus D., Dechesne M., Gordijn E. & Kluwer E. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2003.. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 21-28.
- Van Beest I., Van Dijk E. & Wilke H.A.M. (2004), The interplay of self-interest and equity in coalition formation, En Letra 34(5): 547-565.
- Nieweg M., Van Dijk W.W., Ouwerkerk J.W., Kerkhof P., Goslinga S., Spears R., Pennekamp S.F., Aarts H.A.G., Maas M., Dechesne M., Schwinghammer S.A., Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2004), Leedvermaak om de val van het kabinet. In: Wigboldus D., Dechesne M., Gordijn E. & Kluwer E. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2003.. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 253-260.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2004), De leugen achterhaald: Vertrouwen, attributie en oprechtheid bij het schenden van de gelijkheidsregel in sociale dilemma's. In: Wigboldus D., Dechesne M., Gordijn E. & Kluwer E. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2003.. Groningen: ASPO Pers. 371-378.
- Van Beest I., Van Dijk E. & Wilke H.A.M. (2004), Resources and alternatives in coalition formation: The effects on payoff, self-serving behavior, and bargaining length, En Letra 34(6): 713-728.
- Handgraaf M.J.J., Van Dijk E., Wilke H.A.M. & Vermunt G.C.M. (2004), Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95: 97-106.
- Van Dijk E., De Cremer D. & Handgraaf M.J.J. (2004), Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40: 697-707.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg D.L. (2004), Groepsgedrag. In: Vonk R. (Ed.), Sociale Psychologie. Groningen/Houten: Wolters Noordhoff. 469-507.
- Van Dijk E., Kluwer E. & Wigboldus D. (Eds.) (2003), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2002. Delft: Eburon.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (Eds.) (2003), Editorship Journal Social Justice Research. Social Justice Research.
- Van Dijk E. (2003), Wetenschappelijke ontwikkelingen. De econoom en de psycholoog in ons hoofd, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden 58: 122-130.
- Handgraaf M.J.J., Van Dijk E. & De Cremer D. (2003), Social utility in ultimatum bargaining, Social Justice Research 16(3): 263-283.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2003), Fairness and ethics in social decision making, Social Justice Research 16(3): 191-194.
- Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (2003), The discounting of ambiguous information in economic decision making, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 341-352.
- Handgraaf M.J.J., Van Dijk E., Wilke H.A.M. & Vermunt G.C.M. (2003), The salience of a recipient's alternatives: Inter- and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90: 165-177.
- Van Beest I., Wilke H.A.M. & Van Dijk E. (2003), The excluded player in coalition formation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(2): 237-246.
- Van Putten M. & Van Dijk E. (2003), De effecten van vergelijkbaarheid en tijdsspanne op inactie-inertie. In: Dijk E. van, Kluwer E. & Wigboldus D. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2002. Delft: Eburon. 329-337.
- Van Vugt M., Dowding K., John P. & Van Dijk E. (2003), The exit of residential mobility or the voice of political action? Strategies for problem solving in residential communities, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33(2): 321-338.
- Stouten J., De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2003), Emotionele reacties als gevolg van een schending van de gelijke verdelingsregel in sociale dilemma's. In: Dijk E. van, Kluwer E. & Wigboldus D. (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2002. Delft: Eburon. 285-297.
- Zeelenberg M., Van den Bos C., Van Dijk E. & Pieters R.G.M. (2002), The inaction effect in the psychology of regret, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(3): 314-327.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2002), Perceived criticality and contributions in public good dilemmas: A matter of feeling responsible to all?, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 5(4): 319-332.
- De Cremer D. & Van Dijk E. (2002), Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38: 435-441.
- Mulder L.B., Wilke H.A.M., Van Dijk E. & De Cremer D. (2002), Ondermijning van vertrouwen en cooperatie. In: Stapel D.A., Hagedoorn M. & Dijk E. van (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2001. Delft: Eburon. 105-116.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg D.L. (2001), Weerstand tegen ruil en weerstand tegen verlies. Een economisch-psychologische beschouwing van bezit, Gedrag en Organisatie 14(1): 1-10.
- Mulder L.B., Wilke H.A.M. & Van Dijk E. (2001), Willen we een sanctiesysteem? Ja, want we hebben een sanctiesysteem: Sanctiebehoefte in sociale dilemma's. In: Stapel D., Martijn C., Dijk E. van & Dijksterhuis A. (Eds.), Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie, Vol. 15. Delft: Eburon. 141-150.
- Jonker J., Handgraaf M.J.J., Van Dijk E., Wilke H.A.M. & Vermunt G.C.M. (2001), De invloed van machtsverschillen op de verdeling van schaarse middelen in ultimatum spellen. In: Stapel D., Martijn C., Dijk E. van & Dijksterhuis A. (Eds.), Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie, Vol. 15.. Delft: Eburon. 141-150.
- Van Dijk E. (2001), Van de onzichtbare hand naar het beklimmen van de Martinitoren. In: Ellemers N., Dijk E. van & Wit A.P. (Eds.), Lof der sociale psychologie.. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum. 121-126.
- Van Beest I., Van Dijk E. & Wilke H.A.M. (2000), Eigenbelang en billijkheid in coalitievorming: De deelbaarheid van opbrengsten. In: Martijn C., Rutte C.G., Stapel D.A. & Dijk E. van (Eds.), Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie Deel 14. Delft: Eburon bv. 59-68.
- Van Knippenberg D.L., Van Knippenberg-Wisse B.M. & Van Dijk E. (2000), Who takes the lead in risky decision making? Effects of group members' risk preferences and prototypicality, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83: 213-234.
- Van Dijk E. & Vermunt G.C.M. (2000), Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36: 1-25.
- Van Dijk E. & Wilke H.A.M. (2000), Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: Give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(1): 92-104.
- Van Dijk E. & Wilke H.A.M. (1999), Conditional contributions and public good provision: Perceptions, motives, and behavioral reactions, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2(3): 245-258.
- Van Dijk E., Engelen M.W.H., Van Leeuwen E.A.C., Monden L. & Sluijter E. (1999), Distributive justice and the allocation of costs, losses, and profits, Social Justice Research 12(1): 5-18.
- Van Dijk E., Wilke H.A.M., Wilke M. & Metman L. (1999), What information do we use in social dilemmas? Environmental uncertainty and the employment of coordination rules, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(2): 109-135.
- Van Dijk E. & Zeelenberg M. (1999), Verzonken kosten en riskante beslissingen. Een economisch-psychologische beschouwing, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 12: 116-126.
- Van Dijk E. & Van Knippenberg D.L. (1998), Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion, and the comparability of consumer goods, Journal of Economic Psychology 19: 485-495.
- Van Dijk E. & Wilke H.A.M. (1997), Is it mine or is it ours? Framing property rights and decision making in social dilemmas, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71: 195-209.
- Zeelenberg M. & Van Dijk E. (1997), A reverse sunk cost effect in risky decision making: Sometimes we have too much invested to gamble, Journal of Economic Psychology 18: 677-691.
- Van Dijk E. & Vermunt G.C.M. (1997), Macht, afhankelijkheid en de verdeling van opbrengsten: De kracht van machteloosheid. In: Dreu C.K.W. de, Vries N.K. de, Knippenberg D. van & Rutte C. (Eds.), Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press. 1-14.