Daniel Mândrescu
Universitair docent
- Naam
- D. Mândrescu
- Telefoon
- +31 71 527 7394
- d.mandrescu@law.leidenuniv.nl
Titel onderzoek: The applicability of articles 101 and 102 TFEU to online platforms.
Voor meer informatie: zie de Engelstalige profielpagina.
Universitair docent
- Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid
- Instituut voor Publiekrecht
- Europees Recht
- Mandrescu D. (2023), De conceptbekendmaking inzake de definitie van de relevante markt en meerzijdige digitale platforms: we zijn er nog niet, MP: tijdschrift mededingingsrecht in de praktijk 2023(4): 21-32 (MP 2023/12).
- Mandrescu D. (2023), Market definition and digital platforms. In: Wiggers M., Struijlaart R. & Dibbits J. (red.), Digital competition law in Europe. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 37-76.
- Mândrescu D. (4 januari 2023), On-platform tying or another case of leveraging: a discussion on facebook marketplace. Kluwer Competition Law Blog: Kluwer International . [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (2022), Abusive pricing practices by online platforms: a framework review of Article 102 TFEU for future cases, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 10(3): 469-517.
- Mândrescu D. (18 januari 2022), The Apple App Store case in the Netherlands: a potential game changer. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (5 oktober 2022), The application of EU antitrust law to (dominant) online platforms (Dissertatie. Institute of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Leiden University) Meijers-reeks nr. MI-394. Promotor(en) en copromotor(en): Ottervanger T.R., Van Rompuy B.
- Mândrescu D. (2022), De toepassing van het EU-mededingingsrecht en de DMA op digitale platforms: lessen uit ACM v. Apple, MP: tijdschrift mededingingsrecht in de praktijk 2022(5-6): 11-19 (MP 2022/16).
- Mândrescu D. (7 december 2022), The draft notice on market definition and multisided (digital) platforms: avoiding rather than resolving some of the main challenges. CoRe Blog. Berlin: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (15 november 2022), Case C-721/20 – DB Station & Service: can secondary legislation limit the private enforcement of art. 102 TFEU?. CoRe Blog. Berlin: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (27 oktober 2022), Opinion of AG Kokott in Case-449/21 (Towercast): filling gaps in EU merger control and creating new routes for dealing with killer acquisitions through the DMA. CoRe Blog. Berlin: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (8 maart 2022), The DMA and EU competition law: complementing or cannibalizing enforcement?. CoRe Blog. Berlin: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (2021), Tying and bundling by online platforms – Distinguishing between lawful expansion strategies and anti-competitive practices, Computer Law and Security Review 40: 105499.
- Behre F., Dam J.C.A. van, Schippers M., Sluis M. van der, Haket S., Mândrescu D. & Quintel T. (2021), Reflections on the Young FIDE Seminar 2021: the Young FIDE 2021 Board and the Young Rapporteurs, EU Law Live (Weekend Edition) 64(26 June 2021): 2-6.
- Bostoen F. & Mândrescu D. (2020), Assessing abuse of dominance in the platform economy: a case study of app stores, European Competition Journal 16(2/3): 431-491.
- Mândrescu D. (red.) (2020), EU Competition Law and the Digital Economy: Protecting Free and Fair Competition in an Age of Technological (R)evolution. The XXIX FIDE Congress in The Hague 2020 Congress Publications nr. 3. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
- Mândrescu D. (18 januari 2019), Abuse of dominance through data overcharges and EU competition law enforcement. CoRe blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (21 maart 2019), Business users vs. platforms – a (not entirely) new battle frontier. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (14 mei 2019), App stores and (potential) abuses of dominance – an opportunity to reshape competition law enforcement in digital markets. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (26 juni 2019), The return of the MFN clauses – platform ranking as an enforcement mechanism for price parity. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (6 september 2019), Ex-ante competition law enforcement and online platforms – a tool with no (clear) instructions. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (29 oktober 2019), Lessons and questions from Google Android- Part 1 – the market definition. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D. (27 november 2019), Lessons and questions from Google Android- Part 2 – Tying in two-sided markets, anti-competitive effects and extra-territorial remedies. CoRe Blog: Lexxion. [blog].
- Mândrescu D., annotatie bij: Europese Commissie 6 september 2018. Mf 2019(3): 95-107 (2019/5 Mediaforum 2019/5 Apple/Shazam).
- Mândrescu D. (2018), Applying (EU) Competition Law to Online Platforms: Reflections on the Definition of the Relevant Market(s), World Competition 41(3): 453-483.
- Mandrescu D. (2018), The SSNIP Test and Zero-Pricing Strategies: Considerations for Online Platforms, CoRe: European Competition and Regulatory Law Review 2(4): 244-257.
- Mandrescu D. (2017), Applying EU competition law to online platforms: the road ahead - Part 1, European Competition Law Review 38(8): 353-365.
- Mandrescu D. (2017), Applying EU competition law to online platforms: the road ahead - Part 2, European Competition Law Review 38(9): 410-422.
- Mandrescu D. (2016), One stop shop leniency: the case of DHL Express v Autorita Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-428/14), European Competition Law Review 37(10): 397-402.
- Mandrescu D. (2015), Compulsory licensing - between health and competition: using competition law policy to promote access to medicine, The Global Competition Litigation Review 8(8): 167-183.
- Mandrescu D. (2015), Access to Leniency Programme Documents Based on the Transparency Regulation: The European Commission v. EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 42(3): .
- Editorial board member - Mededingingsrecht in de Praktijk
- Editor CoRe Blog (competition law and regulation)