Trust vs. accountability - from red tape to red flag

 

We all want our science and scholarship to be trustworthy: meaning, high-quality, transparent, FAIR, open, ethical, privacy-respecting, as safe as possible…and each of these virtues (and legal requirements!) comes with best practices, which come with review processes (by peers and/or administrators), forms to fill out, and accountability to funders and employers. In other words, red tape. How much of this red tape serves its intended purpose? Could we abandon most of it - or do we need it to spot red flags? This OSCoffee talk uses a recent experiment, radically reducing the amount of quality monitoring data entry at a Dutch intensive care unit, as a jumping-off point for weighing trust against accountability in the university.

 

To join this meeting you can do two things:
1. For Leiden affiliated: Join the OSCL Teams, and navigate to the 'Open Science Coffee Leiden' channel; there you can join the live meeting. You can then also check-out the rest of the OSCL channels and interesting discussions of members. If you also become a member of OSCL, you can opt in to receive our newsletter and other interesting updates, and you will get a member profile, so other members can find you and see your interests in Open Science
2. Directly join the meeting from 16:00 onwards by clicking this link.

 

Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp Share by Mastodon