Kim de Jong
Assistant Professor
- Name
- Dr. K. de Jong
- Telephone
- +31 71 527 7995
- k.de.jong@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
- ORCID iD
- 0000-0002-7621-9290
Since September 2014 Kim de Jong is back in Leiden as Assistant Professor in the department of clinical psychology. She also has her own practice as an independent basic psychologist.
More information about Kim de Jong
News about Kim de Jong
Kim de Jong earned her doctoral degree in clinical psychology from Leiden University in 2012. Before that, she received her master degree in clinical psychology and in psychological methods at the University of Amsterdam in 2000. After graduating from the UvA, she started working as an applied researcher at GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, a mental health care institution in the Netherlands. During that period, she visited Michael J. Lambert at Brigham Young University for four months. She started as an Assistant Professor in Clinical Psychology at Leiden University in 2013, but received the NWO Rubicon grant that year, which provided her with the opportunity of a Visiting Scholarship at the University of Pennsylvania, where she worked with Robert J. DeRubeis. Since September 2014, she is back in Leiden as Assistant Professor in Clinical Psychology. She also has a small private practice.
Research
Her research focuses on understanding differences in treatment outcomes between organizations, therapists and patients, as well as developing and testing interventions that improve outcomes in routine clinical practice. Kim has two major research lines: personalized mental health care and therapist effects. In personalized mental health treatments are tailored towards the individual patient, based on their characteristics. Kim works with large databases of outcome measurements to predict which interventions work best for which patients. The therapist effects research line focuses on assessing why certain therapists perform better than others. She also investigates interventions that aid therapists to offer more effective care, such as Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) feedback, deliberate practice and training therapeutic skills.
Grants and awards
- Society for Psychotherapy Research Outstanding Early Career Achievement Award (2018)
- Short-listed for the NVP Wim Trijsburg Award for Excellence in Early Career Research in Applied Psychotherapy (2015)
- NWO Rubicon, visiting scholar grant for one year (2013)
- Travel Award, Stichting Catharina van Tussenbroek Fonds (2009)
- Student Travel Award, Society for Psychotherapy Research (2009)
- Foreign Visit Scholarship, Stichting Dr. Muller Vaderlandschfonds (2008)
Other professional activities
- Communications Committee (chair) - Society for Psychotherapy Research
- ROM committee (member) - Landelijke Vereniging Vrijgevestigde Psychologen & Psychotherapeuten
- Network “Useful research for policy and practice” (member) – ZorgOnderzoek Nederland (ZonMw)
- Supervisory committee research “Use of ROM in mental health care” – Trimbos institute, commissioned by the Ministry of Health, Welbeing and Sport
- Advisory Editorial Board - Psychotherapy Research
Relevant links
Assistant Professor
- Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen
- Instituut Psychologie
- Klinische Psychologie
- Koementas-de Vos M.M.W., Tiemens B., Engelsbel F., Jong K. de, Witteman C.L.M. & Nugter M.A. (2024), Renewed Feedback-Informed Group Treatment for Patients with Anxiety and Depressive Disorders, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research : 1-18.
- McAleavey A.A., Jong K. de, Nissen-Lie H.A., Boswell J.F., Moltu C. & Lutz W. (2024), Routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback in psychotherapy: recent advances and future directions, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 51: 291–305.
- Delgadillo J., Nissen-Lie H.A., Jong K. de, Schröder T.A. & Barkham M. (2024), An examination of therapists’ professional characteristics as moderators of the effect of feedback on psychological treatment outcomes, Psychotherapy Research : 1-11.
- Castonguay L.G., Atzil‑Slonim D., Jong K. de & Youn S.J. (2024), Practice‑oriented research : an introduction to new developments and future directions, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 51: 287-290.
- McAleavey A.A., Jong K. de, Nissen-Lie H.A., Boswell J.F., Moltu C. & Lutz W. (2024), Routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback in psychotherapy : recent advances and future directions, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 51: 291-305.
- Jong K. de, Douglas S., Wolpert M., Delgadillo J., Aas B., Bovendeerd B., Carlier I., Compare A., Edbrooke-Childs J., Janse P., Lutz W., Moltu C., Nordberg S., Poulsen S., Rubel J.A., Schiepek G., Schilling V.N.L.S., Sonsbeek M. van & Barkham M. (2024), Using progress feedback to enhance treatment outcomes: a narrative review, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research : .
- Bovendeerd B, Jong K. de, Groot E. de & Keijser J. de (2024), Patient perspectives on systematic client feedback in Dutch outpatient mental healthcare, a qualitative case reports study, BMC Health Services Research 24: 957.
- Thiel S.J. van, Jong K. de, Misset K.S., Joosen M.C.W., Klink J.J.L. van der, Vermunt J.K. & Dam A. van (2024), Determining differences between therapists using an extended version of the facilitative interpersonal skills performance test, Journal of Clinical Psychology 80(7): 1698-1710.
- Jong K. de, Delgadillo J. & Barkham M. (2023), Routine outcome monitoring and feedback in psychological therapies. Maidenhead: McGrawHill Open University Press.
- Carlier I.V., Elst L.V. van der, Jong K. de & Vliet I.M. van (2023), Treatment course comparison between anxiety-related disorders in adult outpatients: a Leiden routine outcome monitoring study, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 211(8): 601-612.
- Bovendeerd B., Jong K. de, Groot E. de, Moerbeek M., Hafkenscheid A. & Keijser J. de (2023), The effect of therapist characteristics on the use and outcome of systematic client feedback in outpatient mental healthcare, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 30(5): 1146-1157.
- Deisenhofer A.K., Barkham M., Beierl E.T., Schwartz B., van Doorn K.A., Beevers C.G., Berwian I.B.,Blackwell S.E., Bockting C.L., Brakemeier E.L., Brown G., Buckman J.E.J., Gastonguay L.G., Cusack C.E., Dalgleish T., e de Jong K., Delgadillo J., DeRubeis R.J., Driessen E., Ehrenreich-May J. & Cohen Z.D. (2023), Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies: barriers and possible ways forward , Behaviour Research and Therapy 172: 104443.
- Barkham M., De Jong K., Delgadillo J. & Lutz W. (2023), Routine outcome monitoring. In: Hill C.E Norcross J.C. (Ed.), Psychotherapy skills and methods that work . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 429–C15P317.
- Janse P.D., Veerkamp C., Jong K. de, Dijk M.K. van, Hutschemaekers G.J.M. & Verbraak M.J.P.M. (2023), Exploring therapist characteristics as potential moderators of the effects of client feedback on treatment outcome, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 30(3): 1-12.
- Barkham M., Jong K. de, Delgadillo J. & Lutz W. (2023), Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and feedback: research review and recommendations, Psychotherapy Research : 1-15.
- Aafjes‐van Doorn K. & Jong K. de (2022), How to make the most of routine outcome monitoring (ROM): a multitude of clinical decisions and nuances to consider, Journal of Clinical Psychology 78(10): 2054-2065.
- Bovenderd B., Jong K. de, Groot E. de, Moerbeek M. & Keijser J. de (2022), Enhancing the effect of psychotherapy through systematic client feedback in outpatient mental healthcare: a cluster randomized trial, Psychotherapy Research 32(6): 710-722.
- Koementas-de Vos M.M., Dijk M. van, Tiemens B., Jong K. de, Witteman C.L. & Nugter M.A. (2022), Feedback-informed group treatment: a qualitative study of the experiences and needs of patients and therapists, International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 72(3): 193-227.
- Koementas-de Vos M.M., Colleye L.C., Tiemens B., Engelsbel F., Jong K. de, Witteman C.L. & Nugter M.A. (2022), The feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a feedback-informed group treatment (FIGT) tool for patients with anxiety or depressive disorders, Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome 25(3): 339-353.
- Jong K. de, Conijn J.M., Gallagher R.A., Reshetnikova A.S., Heij M. & Lutz M.C. (2021), Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: a multilevel meta-analysis, Clinical Psychology Review 85: 1-19 (102002).
- Thiel S.J. van., Joosen M.C., Joki A.L., Dam A. van., Klink J.J. van der. & Jong K. de (2021), Psychometric analysis of the Dutch language Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) video clips, Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome 24(1): 94-105 (513).
- Delgadillo J., McMillan D., Gilbody S., Jong K. de, Lucock M., Lutz W., Rubel J., Aguirre E. & Ali S. (2021), Cost-effectiveness of feedback-informed psychological treatment: evidence from the IAPT-FIT trial, Behaviour Research and Therapy 142: 103873.
- Lutz W., Jong K. de, Rubel J.A. & Delgadillo J. (2021), Measuring, predicting, and tracking change in psychotherapy. In: Barkham. M. Lutz W. Castonguay L.G. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 89-134.
- Brugnera A., Zarbo C., Compare A., Talia A., Tasca G.A., De Jong K., Greco A., Greco F., Pievani L., Auteri A. & Lo Coco G. (2020), Self-reported reflective functioning mediates the association between attachment insecurity and well-being among psychotherapists, Psychotherapy Research 31(2): .
- Janse P.D., Jong K. de, Veerkamp C., Dijk M.K. de, Hutschemaekers G.J. & Verbraak M.J. (2020), The effect of feedback-informed cognitive behavioral therapy on treatment outcome: a randomized controlled trial, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 88(9): 818-828.
- Janse P.D. De Jong K. (2020), Hoe voortgangsfeedback de resultaten van behandelingen verbetert, Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 5(45): 348-360.
- Carlier I.V.E., Van Eeden W.A., De Jong K., Giltay E.J., Van Noorden M.S., Van der Feltz‐Cornelis C., Zitman F.G., Kelderman H. & Van Hemert A.M. (2019), Testing for response shift in treatment evaluation of change in self‐reported psychopathology amongst secondary psychiatric care outpatients, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 28(3): e1785.
- Bovendeerd B., De Jong K., Colijn S., Groot E. de, Hafkenscheid A., Moerbeek M. & Keijser J. de (2019), Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial, BMJ Open 9(5): e025701.
- De Jong K., Segaar J., Ingenhoven T., Van Busschbach J. & Timman R. (2018), Adverse Effects of Outcome Monitoring Feedback in Patients With Personality Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Day Treatment and Inpatient Settings, Journal of Personality Disorders 32(3): 393-413.
- Van Emmerik A.A.P., De Jong K. & Hofmann S.G. (2018), The Evidence for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, JAMA Psychiatry 319(8): 831.
- De Jong K. & Jansen P. (2018), Tijd voor meer nuance in de ROM-discussie, De psycholoog okt.: 46-53.
- Delgadillo J., De Jong K., Lucock M., Lutz W., Rubel J., Gilbody S., Ali S., Aguirre E., Appleton M., Nevin J., O'Hayon H., Patel U., Sainty Dip A., Spencer P. & McMillan D. (2018), Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: a multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial, The Lancet Psychiatry 5(7): 564-572.
- Koementas-de Vos M.M.W., Nugter M.A., Engelsbel F. & De Jong K. (2018), Does progress feedback enhance the outcome of group psychotherapy?, Psychotherapy 55(2): 151-163.
- Timman R., De Jong K. & De Neve-Enthoven N. (2017), Cut-off scores and clinical change indices for the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a large sample of normal and several psychotherapeutic populations, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 24(1): 72-81.
- Janse P.D., De Jong K., Van Dijk M., Hutschemaekers G. & Verbraak M. (2017), Improving the efficiency of cognitive-behavioural therapy by using formal client feedback, Psychotherapy Research 27(5): 525-538.
- De Jong K., Tiemens B., Verbraak E.A., Beekman A.T.F., Bockting C.L.H., Bouman T.K., Castelein S., Dyck R. van, Emmelkamp P.M.G., Feltz-Cornelis C.M. van der, Gaag M. van der, Huibers M.J.H., Hutschemaekers G.J.M., Keijser A. de, Keijsers G.P.J., Koekkoek B., Korrelboom K., Minnen A. van, Oppen P.C. van, Oudejans S.C.C., Oude Voshaar R.C., Schippers G.M., Scholing A., Spijker J., Spinhoven P., Straten A. van, Vermeiren R.R. & Zitman F.G. (2017), Red ROM als kwaliteitsinstrument, Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 59: 242-244.
- Jabrayilov R., Emons W.H.M., De Jong K. & Sijtsma K. (2017), Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire-45 in a clinical sample, Quality of Life Research 26(6): 1473-1481.
- Sonsbeek M.A.M.S., Holtmaat C.J.M., Tiemens B.G., Hutschemaekers G.J.M. & De Jong K. (2017), Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Treatment Support Measure (TSM) parent and youth form, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 24(5): 1205-1218.
- Delgadillo J., Overend K., Lucock M., Groom M., Kirby N., McMillan D., Gilbody S., Lutz W., Rubel J.A. & De Jong K. (2017), Improving the efficiency of psychological treatment using outcome feedback technology, Behaviour Research and Therapy 99: 89-97.
- De Jong K. (2016), Challenges in the implementation of measurement feedback systems, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 43(3): 467-470.
- De Jong K. (2016), Behandelresultaten van vrijgevestigde psychologen en psychotherapeuten, Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 42(5): 308-317.
- Kendrick T., El-Gohary M., Stuart B., Gilbody S., Churchill R., Aiken L., Bhattacharya A., Gimson A., Brütt A.L., De Jong K. & Moore M. (2016), Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental disorders in adults, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 13(7): e1119.
- De Jong K. (2016), Verschillen tussen behandelaars in het omgaan met routinematige uitkomstmetingen, Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice 14(2): 18-20.
- Lutz W., De Jong K. & Rubel J. (2015), Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go?, Psychotherapy Research 25(6): 625-632.
- De Jong K. & De Goede M. (2015), Why do some therapists not deal with outcome monitoring feedback? A feasibility study on the effect of regulatory focus and person-organization fit on attitude and outcome, Psychotherapy Research 25(6): 661-668.
- Conijn J.M., Emons W.H.M., De Jong K. & Sijtsma K. (2015), Detecting and explaining aberrant responding to the outcome questionnaire–45, Assessment 22(4): 513-524.
- De Jong K. (2015), Deriving implementation strategies for outcome monitoring feedback from theory, research and practice, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research : 1-5.
- De Jong K., Timman R., Hakkaart-Van Roijen L., Vermeulen P., Kooiman K., Passchier J. & Busschbach J.V. (2014), The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: A randomized trial, Psychotherapy Research 24(6): 629-639.
- Bouwmans C., De Jong K., Timman R., Swan Tan S., Vlasveld M., Van der Felz-Cornelis C. & Hakkaart-Van Roijen L. (2013), Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on health care utilization and productivity (TiC-P), BMC Health Services Research 13: 217.
- De Jong K. & Van 't Spijker A. (2013), Routine outcome monitoring: Love it or leave it?, Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 39: 190-194.
- De Jong K. & Nugter A. (2013), De gespannen relatie tussen benchmarking en gebruik van ROM voor de behandeling. Reactie op Verbraak, De psycholoog 34: 40.
- La Croix K., De Jong K. & De Groot E. (2013), Is de ene therapeut beter dan de andere? Een verkenning van therapeuteffecten in Nederland, Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 39: 172-187.
- Nugter M.A., De Jong K. & Kortrijk H. (2013), Meten van verandering bij ROM. In: Buwalda V.J.A., Nugter M.A., Tilburg W. van & Beekman A.T. (Eds.), Praktijkboek ROM in de GGZ II. Implementatie en gebruik bij verschillende doelgroepen. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom. 149-164.
- De Jong K. (17 April 2012), A chance for change : building an outcome monitoring feedback system for outpatient mental health care (Dissertatie. Clinical, Health and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University). Supervisor(s) and Co-supervisor(s): Spinhoven P. & Heiser W.J., Nugter M.A.
- De Jong K. (2012), De rol van de behandelaar: de ‘vergeten’ factor in ROM, Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 54(2): 197-201.
- De Jong K. (2012), Outcome monitoring feedback over behandelvoortgang bij ambulante psychiatrische behandelingen: Wat is effectief?, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Behavioral Medicine 23: 11-13.
- Noom M., De Jong K., Tiemens B., Kamsteeg F., Pot A.M., Schippers G.M., Swildens W., Sytema S., Theunissen J., Van der Vlist H.P., Vuyk J. & Zondervan T. (2012), ROM en benchmarking: Hoe kunnen behandelresultaten op een zorgvuldige manier vergeleken worden?, Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 54(2): 141-145.
- De Jong K., Van Sluis P., Nugter M.A., Heiser W.J. & Spinhoven P. (2012), Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial, Psychotherapy Research 22(4): 464-474.
- De Jong K., Moerbeek M. & Leeden M. van der (2010), A priori power analysis in longitudinal three-level multilevel models: An example with therapist effect, Psychotherapy Research 20(3): 273-284.
- Wennberg P., Philips B. & De Jong K. (2010), The Swedish version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Reliability and factor structure in a substance abuse sample, Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 83(3): 325-329.
- De Jong K., Nugter A., Polak M., Wagenborg H., Spinhoven P. & Heiser W. (2008), The Dutch version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): a cross-cultural validation, Psychologie & Gezondheid 36(1): 35-45.
- De Jong K., Nugter M.A., Polak M.G., Wagenborg J.E.A., Spinhoven P. & Heiser W.J. (2007), The Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Dutch population: A cross-cultural validation, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 14: 288-301.
- freelance waarnemend basispsycholoog
- onderwijs GZ opleiding
- Clinical Advisory Board onderzoeksprogramma New Science of Mental Disorder
- Onderzoekssupervisie GIOS