Publication
Increased alertness and moderate ingroup cohesion in bonobos’ response to outgroup cues
In the face of threats from other groups, humans, chimpanzees, and a selection of other species get closer with their own. This research shows that even bonobos show a moderated version of this effect. This suggests that this behavior may emerged prior to the Pan-Homo split, several millions years ago. Publication in Plos One.
- Author
- James Brooks, Karlijn van Heijst, Amanda Epping, Seok Hwan Lee, Aslihan Niksarli, Amy Pope, Zanna Clay, Mariska E. Kret, Jared Taglialatela, Shinya Yamamoto
- Date
- 21 August 2024
- Links
- Plos One: Increased alertness and moderate ingroup cohesion in bonobos’ response to outgroup cues
A link between outgroup threats and ingroup cohesion has been considered since the time of Darwin to be an adaptation for group-based competition. During the years since, studies of all sorts from chimpanzees to cichlid fish to mongooses have found evidence supporting this view, but a crucial question has remained unanswered: what about species without strong inter-group competition?
To find an answer, the KyotoU team set up an experiment matched as closely as possible to an earlier study with chimpanzees: playback of vocalizations from other groups. In total, eight groups of bonobos at five sites in four countries were studied. 'We had no idea how this would turn out', says lead author James Brooks. 'Without lethal competition between groups, a link between ingroup cohesion and outgroup competition wouldn't be so adaptive, but if the effect dated back to before the human-chimpanzee-bonobo evolutionary split, then there might still be relics of the effect in modern bonobos.'
The team's findings, published in the journal PLOS ONE, indicate that the observed bonobos were alert and attentive to the calls of other groups, but showed just a minor increase in affiliation with their own group when compared to chimpanzees. The bonobos were observed sitting upright more and resting less, with a subtle increase in rates of social grooming, a key behavior for reinforcing social bonds.
The authors hypothesize that our common ancestor -- living 5–6 million years ago -- may have had some group-based conflict, but that as the intensity decreased in bonobos' evolutionary history, so too did the strength of the effect. 'Although our study exposes deep roots to group conflict among our species, the real takeaway is that this can be overcome', adds Brooks, 'not merely in individual instances, but on a species level.'
All other ape species, including gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees, gibbons, and humans, have been observed killing one another in the wild. Bonobos may have found a way to end this pattern, not only because they do not commit lethal aggression today, but more importantly because at some point within the past few million years they somehow stopped. 'Humans are capable of both: we can commit horrific acts to those we see as outside our group, but we're also capable of collaborating and working together across borders', says senior author Shinya Yamamoto, highlighting the international nature of the team.
'Bonobos teach us that the ways our ancestors treated other groups does not seal our fate. Our own species has elements of both chimpanzee and bonobo group relations, so it is crucial that we understand how both can, and have, evolved.'